https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/19/us/teens-mock-native-elder-trnd/index.html
This weekend in Washington DC, MAGA-gear-wearing White teenage boys from a Kentucky Catholic School first got into a verbal altercation with some Black kids, then, when a Native American elder approached drumming and singing, they surrounded and taunted him.
That smirking boy? I have seen that exact smirk from White boys who told me how women owe men sex (and also from White girls who told me how Black people commit all the crimes in the US). I have seen that smirk so many times from people who just laid out their supposedly logical proof of why I'm not fully human.
I fully expect to find bunches of articles about how this is a brave and admirable exercise of free speech on the White boys' part. I've already seen two different commenters accuse the Native American elder of being "confrontational" and "threatening". Yes, one elderly man armed with a drum is so threatening to a bunch of strapping teenage boys.
In my experience of discussions of free speech it's people like these boys whose rights are championed, and definitely not people such as this elder. And yet the free speech champions have a point -- there are practical and ethical reasons why the US is very cautious about banning speech even aside of supporting the status quo. I don't think laws could have prevented this incident, that what happened was within the purview of laws.
I think it's within the purview of decency. I know that it's a time honored practice to say "people are worse than they used to be", "back in my day," etc, so I'm trying not to say the former and hell, I can say a lot more than I used to be able to. But I do think this incident demonstrates the hatefulness and bigotry the US is currently awash in and that it's not evenly distributed across "both sides". The acceptability of bigotry reactively began rising after President Obama was elected and has mushroomed since President Trump's election.
Also, Covington Catholic High School supposedly is considering expelling the boys, but1) the school was reportedly using the incident for fundraising their website before replacing that with a disavowal and 2) they'd just be heroes wherever else they went in their home communities. They're heroes right now to millions of people who voted for Trump, who chanted along with them "build the wall!" (The whole concept of chanting "build the wall!" at a Native American, the subtext of "The USA is for White people and we're going to drive you out," that deserves an essay of analysis on its own.)
People like to think that racism is the provence of the old and his dying off, but that has never been my experience. And here we can see it strong and thriving in these healthy and belligerent young White men and the community which taught and produced them. I think they're the future of the country I live in, and that scares me.
This weekend in Washington DC, MAGA-gear-wearing White teenage boys from a Kentucky Catholic School first got into a verbal altercation with some Black kids, then, when a Native American elder approached drumming and singing, they surrounded and taunted him.
That smirking boy? I have seen that exact smirk from White boys who told me how women owe men sex (and also from White girls who told me how Black people commit all the crimes in the US). I have seen that smirk so many times from people who just laid out their supposedly logical proof of why I'm not fully human.
I fully expect to find bunches of articles about how this is a brave and admirable exercise of free speech on the White boys' part. I've already seen two different commenters accuse the Native American elder of being "confrontational" and "threatening". Yes, one elderly man armed with a drum is so threatening to a bunch of strapping teenage boys.
In my experience of discussions of free speech it's people like these boys whose rights are championed, and definitely not people such as this elder. And yet the free speech champions have a point -- there are practical and ethical reasons why the US is very cautious about banning speech even aside of supporting the status quo. I don't think laws could have prevented this incident, that what happened was within the purview of laws.
I think it's within the purview of decency. I know that it's a time honored practice to say "people are worse than they used to be", "back in my day," etc, so I'm trying not to say the former and hell, I can say a lot more than I used to be able to. But I do think this incident demonstrates the hatefulness and bigotry the US is currently awash in and that it's not evenly distributed across "both sides". The acceptability of bigotry reactively began rising after President Obama was elected and has mushroomed since President Trump's election.
Also, Covington Catholic High School supposedly is considering expelling the boys, but1) the school was reportedly using the incident for fundraising their website before replacing that with a disavowal and 2) they'd just be heroes wherever else they went in their home communities. They're heroes right now to millions of people who voted for Trump, who chanted along with them "build the wall!" (The whole concept of chanting "build the wall!" at a Native American, the subtext of "The USA is for White people and we're going to drive you out," that deserves an essay of analysis on its own.)
People like to think that racism is the provence of the old and his dying off, but that has never been my experience. And here we can see it strong and thriving in these healthy and belligerent young White men and the community which taught and produced them. I think they're the future of the country I live in, and that scares me.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-20 08:08 pm (UTC)That's not speech, free or otherwise. Preventing someone from leaving a place when you have no lawful right to detain them is violence.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-20 08:22 pm (UTC)Or in other words I totally agree with you but I think a significant number of my fellow citizens don't agree with us, and that dismays me, not because I want to be Right but because this disagreement has massive real world consequences.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-20 08:31 pm (UTC)Those young white fools now have their faces plastered across the world's media and I wish them joy of the reaction.
That stare-y one I have to admit I found really disturbing! You see faces like that in images of Kz guards. :o(
Not everyone thinks quite like a certain sort of horribly overprivileged person in the US seems to think, thankfully.
I'm not even going to get into the school they were from and what they were purportedly 'protesting'.......
Hugs
no subject
Date: 2019-01-20 11:11 pm (UTC)hugs you back
Yeah. I've seen that smirk in real life, and I've seen it in pictures. In real life it always followed some horrible bigoted statement and in pictures it appears on cops blasting civil rights protestors with cannon hoses and, as you pointed out, Kz guards.
shudders
At least a great many people find this horrifying, too.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-20 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-01-20 09:29 pm (UTC)Well. Or maybe so that it's harder to let these things continue to be the new normal? Something like that.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-20 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-01-20 11:04 pm (UTC)Oh, absolutely. (And it took them a while to realize this looks bad)
no subject
Date: 2019-01-20 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-01-20 11:03 pm (UTC)I needed to be reminded of this. :) Thank you.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-20 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-01-21 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-01-21 02:47 am (UTC)If the school only takes action against them, though, then they are complicit. Those kids learned those disgusting attitudes -- from their parents, from their all-white Christian school, from their preachers... there is a systemic problem, and both the outbreak and the infectious cause need to be treated. Somehow.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-21 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-01-21 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-01-21 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-01-21 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-01-22 07:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-01-22 04:58 am (UTC)Ann O.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-22 07:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-01-22 05:56 pm (UTC)